Explore

Slice the corpus on any axis.

Filter by firm, year, function, metric or slide category — then see the result as a narrative arc, a treemap of slide types, or a catalog of slides.

clear
51,416 slides across 1229 decks match.
Treemap Arc Catalog
RCA – Process
Deloitte · 2015 · process_diagram
RCA – Process
 RCA – Key Opportunities
Deloitte · 2015 · initiative_list
RCA – Key Opportunities
 RCA – Key Opportunities
Deloitte · 2015 · initiative_list
RCA – Key Opportunities
 Educational Programs (EP)
Deloitte · 2015 · section_divider
Educational Programs (EP)
 EP – Number of Employees and FTEs by Location
Deloitte · 2015 · data_table
EP – Number of Employees and FTEs by Location
148.62 — FTE
 EP – Number of Employees and FTEs by Location
Deloitte · 2015 · data_table
EP – Number of Employees and FTEs by Location
53.37 — FTE
 EP – Key Opportunities
Deloitte · 2015 · initiative_list
EP – Key Opportunities
 Auxiliaries (AUX)
Deloitte · 2015 · section_divider
Auxiliaries (AUX)
 AUX – Number of Employees and FTEs by Location
Deloitte · 2015 · data_table
AUX – Number of Employees and FTEs by Location
25.91 — FTE
 AUX – Labor Cost
Deloitte · 2015 · financial_analysis
AUX – Labor Cost
$6.5M — Labor Cost
 AUX – Fragmentation by Process (Labor Cost)
Deloitte · 2015 · appendix
AUX – Fragmentation by Process (Labor Cost)
$1,195,000 — Labor Cost
 AUX – Key Opportunities
Deloitte · 2015 · initiative_list
AUX – Key Opportunities
 Research, Scholarship, and Creative Activities (RSC)
Deloitte · 2015 · section_divider
Research, Scholarship, and Creative Activities (RSC)
 RSC – Number of Employees and FTEs by Location
Deloitte · 2015 · data_table
RSC – Number of Employees and FTEs by Location
429.56 — FTE
 RSC – Number of Employees and FTEs by Location (Colleges)
Deloitte · 2015 · data_table
RSC – Number of Employees and FTEs by Location (Colleges)
332 — FTEs
 RSC – Divisional average labor cost per process
Deloitte · 2015 · data_table
RSC – Divisional average labor cost per process
$90K — Average labor cost per FTE
 RSC – Colleges average labor cost per process
Deloitte · 2015 · data_table
RSC – Colleges average labor cost per process
$160K — Average labor cost per FTE
 RSC – Key Opportunities
Deloitte · 2015 · initiative_list
RSC – Key Opportunities
 Appendix
Deloitte · 2015 · appendix
Appendix
 New Mexico State University Administrative Taxonomy (1 of 3)
Deloitte · 2015 · segmentation
New Mexico State University Administrative Taxonomy (1 of 3)
 New Mexico State University Administrative Taxonomy (2 of 3)
Deloitte · 2015 · other
New Mexico State University Administrative Taxonomy (2 of 3)
 New Mexico State University Administrative Taxonomy (3 of 3)
Deloitte · 2015 · other
New Mexico State University Administrative Taxonomy (3 of 3)
 Formulas Used
Deloitte · 2015 · appendix
Formulas Used
 State of Data 2023
IPSOS · 2023 · cover
State of Data 2023
 Table of Contents
IPSOS · 2023 · table_of_contents
Table of Contents
 Foreword
IPSOS · 2023 · other
Foreword
 Five Things You Need to Know
IPSOS · 2023 · key_takeaways
Five Things You Need to Know
 Executive Summary
IPSOS · 2023 · executive_summary
Executive Summary
64% — DCR adoption rate
 Executive Summary
IPSOS · 2023 · executive_summary
Executive Summary
52% — DCR user challenges
 Privacy-Preserving Technology: Adoption and Usage
IPSOS · 2023 · section_divider
Privacy-Preserving Technology: Adoption and Usage
 Data Clean Rooms: Hurdles and Opportunities for Growth
IPSOS · 2023 · section_divider
Data Clean Rooms: Hurdles and Opportunities for Growth
 Recap: Five Things You Need to Know
IPSOS · 2023 · key_takeaways
Recap: Five Things You Need to Know
 Privacy-Preserving Technology: Considerations and Best Practices
IPSOS · 2023 · section_divider
Privacy-Preserving Technology: Considerations and Best Practices
 Privacy-Preserving Technology: Interconnectivity Map
IPSOS · 2023 · process_diagram
Privacy-Preserving Technology: Interconnectivity Map
 Evaluation Phase: Key considerations
IPSOS · 2023 · framework_other
Evaluation Phase: Key considerations
 Implementation and Maintenance Phase(s): Best practices
IPSOS · 2023 · implementation_plan
Implementation and Maintenance Phase(s): Best practices
 Data Clean Rooms: Understanding the Benefits and Use Cases
IPSOS · 2023 · section_divider
Data Clean Rooms: Understanding the Benefits and Use Cases
 Appendix
IPSOS · 2023 · appendix
Appendix
 DCR Privacy Controls and Methods to Protect Consumer Data
IPSOS · 2023 · process_diagram
DCR Privacy Controls and Methods to Protect Consumer Data
 Evaluation Phase: Additional factors for consideration (1 of 2)
IPSOS · 2023 · other
Evaluation Phase: Additional factors for consideration (1 of 2)
 Evaluation Phase: Additional factors for consideration (2 of 2)
IPSOS · 2023 · other
Evaluation Phase: Additional factors for consideration (2 of 2)
 Methodology
IPSOS · 2023 · appendix
Methodology
203 — sample size
 Respondent Profile
IPSOS · 2023 · other
Respondent Profile
48% — Respondent distribution
 About IAB
IPSOS · 2023 · other
About IAB
 About the IAB Measurement, Addressability & Data Center
IPSOS · 2023 · other
About the IAB Measurement, Addressability & Data Center
 About Ipsos
IPSOS · 2023 · other
About Ipsos
 About our Sponsors
IPSOS · 2023 · other
About our Sponsors
 A Perspective from TransUnion: Becoming a Data Leader
IPSOS · 2023 · case_study
A Perspective from TransUnion: Becoming a Data Leader
Next page →